Brief
Skip to content Gizmodo Latest News Reviews io9 Science Deals Downloads Newsletters Biology Bigfoot-Like Ancient Apes Might Have Been Closer to Humans Than We Realize A new study has broken down all the ways that the old distinctions between the “Homo” in “Homo sapiens” and several closely related ancient primate categories are falling apart. By Matthew Phelan Published August 20, 2026, 5:15 pm ET Reading time 3 minutes A head model of the ancient primate Australopithecus afarensis at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, which might belong with humans in genus Homo. © Tim Evanson via Flickr, CC 2.0 license Read Later Read Later Comments (7) Decades of paleontological work across southern China exploded into a wave of serious interest in famous cryptids, like Yeti and Bigfoot, after zoologist Wladimir Tschernezky first published his analysis of a mysterious footprint in the journal Nature in 1960. Tschernezky’s paper floated the idea that this footprint, alongside local Yeti reports from the surrounding Himalayas, pointed to the continued existence of a “very huge, heavily built bipedal primate” likely similar to the ancient Gigantopithecus fossils then emerging from those China dig sites. To the ongoing consternation of joyless scolds, Tschernezky’s hypothesis has forever linked his study’s “Abominable Snowman” and America’s legendary Sasquatch to Gigantopithecus —the quite literally gigantic genus of great ape that made Asia its home from about 2 million to 200,000 years ago. In the intervening 76 years since Tschernezky’s paper, anthropologists, paleontologists, and experts in primate anatomy and genetics have since learned a lot more about Gigantopithecus and related prehistoric primates, like Paranthropus and Australopithecus . Now, a new study published Tuesday in the American Journal of Biological Anthropology argues that several of these groups ought to be recategorized into the genus Homo , alongside Homo Sapiens like us. “These groups do not necessarily represent distinct evolutionary branches, or ‘clades,’ and differences in behaviour and ecology once used to distinguish them have also become increasingly difficult to maintain,” Ian Towle, a research fellow at the Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and author of the study, explained in a statement. The fossil record on several genera of extinct ape, he writes in the paper, have shown these primates to display smaller and more human-like canine teeth, among other dental similarities; and those cases included specimens from the genera Indopithecus , Ouranopithecus , and (Bigfoot suspects themselves) Gigantopithecus . ‘Wastebasket’ taxonomy “The more we learn about our ancestors and close fossil relatives, the more we realise how complex and non-linear our family tree is,” according to Towle, whose early work focused on dental evidence from fossil hominins, a broad category that includes humans and chimpanzees. To make his case, Towle focused particularly on the increasingly arbitrary and messy distinctions now used to maintain the boundary between Homo and Australopithecus as distinct genera over recent decades. Originally, for example, the genus Homo was defined in part by its larger brain size, until a variety of ancient primate fossils beginning with Homo habilis in 1964 were formally folded into the group. Still more modern additions, including Homo floresiensis and Homo naledi , have brain sizes roughly equivalent to those of Australopithecus , the researcher noted. Another key trait once limited to humanity’s closest relations, the use of tools, is now widely acknowledged as a much more common skill across primate species than people once assumed. The genus Paranthropus , Towle noted, had previously been presumed to lack the aptitude for tool use—until around 2023, when their 2.6-million-year-old fossils started popping up alongside ancient tools at dig sites in Kenya and Ethiopia. “It has become increasingly clear that ‘wastebasket’ taxa defined by one or a few traits, such as brain size, locomotion, or tool use, do not map neatly, or even plausibly, onto phylogenetic reconstructions of homininans,” Towle wrote in the new study. Homo prospectus While Towle stops short of suggesting that some of these primates, like Gigantopithecus and Ouranopithecus , should actually be folded into genus Homo , he does advise that something like this should occur for Paranthropus and Australopithecus . (Nevermind, for the moment, that some scholars have recorded close similarities between Gigantopithecus and Australopithecus .) “The central argument of this paper is not that the specific taxonomic solution proposed here is necessarily the best one,” Towle admitted, “but rather that the current treatment of homininan genera is increasingly difficult to justify.” In other words, a fairly obvious conversation needs to be had to resolve over 150 years of species categorization that has not exactly modernized alongside all the scientific methods used to study these living and once living things. “Modern taxonomy, the science of naming and classifying organisms, increasingly aims to reflect genuine evolutionary relationships, grouping species according to their shared ancestry,” Towle noted. “But when it comes to our own evolutionary history, scientists have been slower to make the transition.” Explore more on these topics ancient humans anthropology bigfoot Primates Share this story Copied! Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe and interact with our community, get up to date with our customised Newsletters and much more. Gizmodo io9 Earther The Next Interface Subscribe now Leave this field empty if you're human: The Best Tech and Gear for Back to School 2026 Latest news Aug 20 8:00 pm Netflix’s Anime NYC Line Up Is Ridiculously Stacked Aug 20 7:00 pm There’s Life Before Watching ‘Bone Tomahawk,’ and Then There’s Life After Watching ‘Bone Tomahawk’ Aug 20 6:38 pm Dave Bautista Is Kratos in ‘God of War’ Aug 20 6:00 pm Bruce Campbell Has Been Retired as Ash for a While, Actually Aug 20 5:55 pm Grok Is Having a Hard Time Aug 20 5:15 pm Bigfoot-Like Ancient Apes Might Have Been Closer to Humans Than We Realize Aug 20 5:10 pm Republicans Turn to Elon Musk and AI Super PACs for a Bailout Ahead of Midterms Aug 20 5:00 pm ‘A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms’ Composer Explains the Show’s Two Big Needle Drops Show All Latest news Latest Reviews Aug 20 3:00 pm The Best Tech and Gear for Back to School 2026 Aug 19 5:00 pm Ozlo Sleepbuds 2 Review: Comfy Sleep Earbuds With an Uncomfortable Price Aug 19 4:45 pm Google Pixel 11 Pro and 11 Pro XL Review: Still Growing Into Their AI Shoes Aug 16 11:30 am Bose QuietComfort Headphones (2nd Gen) Review: Still More Quiet and Comfortable Than Most Aug 16 9:30 am Schlage Sense Pro Review: Who Needs a Key Anyway? Aug 13 6:00 pm Viture Pro 2 Review: A Dark Horse in the Entry-Level AR Glasses Race Aug 12 9:00 am Insta360 X6 Review: The King of 360 Cameras Reclaims Its Crown Aug 10 2:05 pm Samsung Odyssey G80HS Monitor Review: 6K Isn’t the Future of Gaming Show All Latest Reviews Related Articles The Best Tech and Gear for Back to School 2026 Whether your budget is $10 or $1,300, we've got tech and gear recommendations that will make the new semester more productive and entertaining. Other Gadgets Raymond Wong, Kyle Barr, James Pero, and Matt Wille Aug 20 Archaeologists Thought This Famous Bronze Age Shaman Was a Guy. Well, She Wasn’t And she might not have been a shaman, either. Human History Gayoung Lee Jul 23 Here’s How This ‘Hobbit’-Like Human Ancestor Survived on an Island With Komodo Dragons Researchers working with the Smithsonian pored over 10,061 artifacts and other elements to determine whether tiny ‘Homo floresiensis’ used fire or hunted big game. Human History Matthew Phelan Jul 3 The Last Neanderthals Weren’t the Genetic Disasters We Thought The ancient hominins were likely more diverse and lived in well-connected communities, a new study suggests. Human History Gayoung Lee Jun 24 Humans Were Using Fire Long Before Scientists Thought Possible, Study Says An international team in South Africa has pinned the earliest known use of fire by Homo erectus back to between 1.07 and 1.79 million years ago. Human History Matthew Phelan Jun 18 Ötzi the Iceman’s Microbes Still Show Signs of Life After 5,300 Years New research provides a deep dive into the ancient and modern day microbes that call Ötzi home. Health Ed Cara Jun 2 ©2026 GIZMODO USA LLC. All rights reserved. 𝕏 About Us Other editions Deutsch Español Français Português Jobs Product Review Newsletters Your Privacy Choices Privacy Policy Terms of Use Accessibility Advertising & Licensing 𝕏 We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our sites. Search Sign up for our newsletters Latest Tech News Artificial Intelligence Commerce Crime Cryptocurrencies Culture Gadgets Internet Politics Privacy & Security Robots Social Media Sploid Tech Policy Transportation Reviews Smartphones Laptops Headphones Gaming Home Entertainment & Smart Home Other Gadgets Tablets Accessories & Wearables Desktops Deals Buying Guides Science Biology Health Human History Physics & Chemistry Space & Spaceflight Earther Climate Change Conservation Earth Science Energy Environmental Justice io9 io9 Reviews Movies Trailers Television Books & Comics Anime Toys & Collectibles Games Corporate Culture Theme Parks & Destinations Videos Software Best VPN Free VPN Cheap VPN NordVPN Review ExpressVPN Review Watch World Cup 2026 Best eSIM Cloud Storage Free Cloud Storage pCloud Review Web Hosting Hostinger Review Best Antivirus Download Hub About Us Other editions Deutsch Español Français Português Jobs Product Review Newsletters Your Privacy Choices Privacy Policy Terms of Use Accessibility Advertising & Licensing 𝕏 Bookmarks Cookies settings
Comments
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment.